public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: richard@wetafx.co.nz
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: other/3657: Documentation bug re "Problems with floating point computation"
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010712061601.16909.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw)

>Number:         3657
>Category:       other
>Synopsis:       Documentation bug re "Problems with floating point computation"
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jul 11 23:26:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Richard Addison-Wood
>Release:        n/a
>Organization:
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
This web page:

http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html

shows this example code fragment:

  double min = 0.0;
  double max = 0.5;
  double width = 0.01;
  std::cout << (int)(((max - min) / width) - 1) << std::endl;

and asserts that it "might print 50 on some systems
and optimization levels, and 51 on others."

I assert that it is only reasonable that this code
would be expected to print 49 or 48.

I know this is a bit picky, since the main point
of the example is to show that finite representation
of real numbers has limitations and to be aware
of rounding issues.  However, it is easy to correct
the comment.
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile and run the example on a few systems
and at different optimization levels.  The
results should be 49 or 48.
>Fix:
Revise the example code or the comment about what
the result should be.

It may also be useful to show, for this trivial
example, how to revise it to be more reliable.
For example:

  (int)(((max - min) / width) - 0.5
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-11 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-11 23:26 richard [this message]
2002-12-05 13:46 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010712061601.16909.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --to=richard@wetafx.co.nz \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).