From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sebor@roguewave.com
Subject: Re: c++/3902: gcc 3.0 unable to resolve an overload taking the address of a template member
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 02:43:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010801094300.21928.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00001.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: gcc 3.0 unable to resolve an overload taking the address of a template member

State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Wed Aug  1 02:42:59 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    this is a parser bug, which will be fixed by the ongoing new
    parser work. In case you've not noticed, the first
    function declaration
    	S foo (T (T))
    is ambiguous - is the second T an parameter name with extra
    parentheses, or a parameter list? You and the std require
    the latter interpretation, g++ takes the former. See 8.2/7
    
    you can work around it by introducing a dummy name.
    	S foo (T _name_ (T))

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3902&database=gcc