From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/4071: "make install" installs .../include/g++-v3/Makefile Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:06:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010822010600.28029.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00560.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4071; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: Phil Richards Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/4071: "make install" installs .../include/g++-v3/Makefile Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:37:58 -0400 On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:00:55PM +0100, Phil Richards wrote: > I keep a list of all files installed (for later clean-up), and when > cross-checking what needed keeping between gcc 3.0 and gcc 3.0.1 > noticed that > /usr/local/include/g++-v3/Makefile > existed in 3.0.1 and not 3.0. That's... amusing. Happening here too, although not on the 3.1 branch. A quick look at the differences between the branches doesn't point out anything obvious to me, but it was just a quick look. > >Fix: > gcc-3.0.1/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am:420 needs to exclude Makefile. > > Quick (tested on GNU find) hack: I'll look this over tomorrow and apply it if it works okay. Thanks! Phil -- Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken. - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC