Re: libstdc++/4071: "make install" installs .../include/g++-v3/Makefile

[Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4071; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4071: "make install" installs .../include/g++-v3/Makefile
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:25:38 -0400

 On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:06:00AM -0000, Phil Edwards wrote:
 >  That's... amusing.  Happening here too, although not on the 3.1 branch.
 >  A quick look at the differences between the branches doesn't point out
 >  anything obvious to me, but it was just a quick look.
 
 Obviously I'm blind.  A simple annotation search points to this on mainline:
 
     2001-08-07  Benjamin Kosnik  <bkoz@redhat.com>
 
             Implement std::messages.
 [...]
             * include/Makefile.am (install-data-local): Don't install Makefile.
 
 So this will be fixed whenever this patch goes over into the branch.
 Since it isn't a critical issue, there's no point in making the future
 merging any more difficult than it usually is by moving pieces of the
 patch early.  In the meantime we'll just have to hope that nobody chdir's
 into the header installation directory and types 'make'.  :-)
 
 
 Phil
 
 -- 
 Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
 new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
 which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                      - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC