From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/4238
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:46:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010905184600.26395.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00109.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/4238; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, artem@zavtra.ru
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/4238
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 20:47:44 +0200

 Hi,
 
 a smaller test case for this bug is the following piece of code:
 
 template<class T> struct A
 {
     void f()
     {
         struct B { B(int){} };
         B b(0);
     }
 };
 
 
 void g()
 {
     A<void> a;
     a.f();
 }
 
 
 It crashes gcc 3.0 on a LINUX box as well as gcc 3.0 and the 20010903
 snapshot of gcc 3.0.2 (prerelease) on an IRIX box.
 And you only need -O to get the crash. ;-)
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4238&database=gcc