public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wilson@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	sje@cup.hp.com, wilson@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/2246: Code generated for IA64 doesn't reset NaT bit on scratch reg
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010918042310.19904.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw)

Synopsis: Code generated for IA64 doesn't reset NaT bit on scratch reg

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->wilson
Responsible-Changed-By: wilson
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Sep 17 21:23:08 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    IA-64 maintainer
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: wilson
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 17 21:23:08 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    The only way to fix this problem is to initialize all
    local variables when they are declared.  Gcc does not
    have infrastructure to do this at the moment, so this
    will require development work.  There is also a concern
    that this will result in redundant stores that the optimizer
    may not be able to eliminate, and thus may result in a
    performance regression.  Additional optimizations may
    be necessary to avoid this problem.
    
    As yet, this has not been observed to cause problems on
    ia64-linux, primarily because gcc does not have speculation
    support, and thus we never set the NAT bit.  This has been
    observed to cause problems on HPUX, as the HPUX compiler
    does use speculation, and thus the NAT bit can be set.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2246&database=gcc


             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-17 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-17 21:23 wilson [this message]
2001-11-16  9:36 wilson
2001-11-16  9:38 wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010918042310.19904.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --to=wilson@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sje@cup.hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).