From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/4352: jc1 gets confused looking for array of local class Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:46:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010919204601.30194.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00410.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/4352; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco To: per@bothner.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: java/4352: jc1 gets confused looking for array of local class Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:40:47 -0700 (PDT) per@bothner.com writes: > While building Tomcat (using Anthony Green's rhug packaging), jc1 > complains incorrectly I can't reproduce this particular problem. > class_type that is: > > align 16 symtab 0 alias set -1> I see this case being handled, although incorrectly, I agree. > I think we should be consistent in that the name of a type is the > source-lvele name not the signature, whether the class comes from > .java or .class. Yes. Using terminating []s is fine. But then I'd have to change some other things. So, I suggest that you keep using your patch for the time being (and other rhug-rhats should probably do so.) Meanwhile, I'll work on a fix, it shouldn't take too long. ./A