From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20318 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2001 09:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20273 invoked by uid 71); 12 Nov 2001 09:06:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011112090604.20271.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/3099; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Joseph S. Myers" , Jason Molenda Cc: Christopher Faylor , , , , , , , Subject: Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:50:24 +0100 (CET) On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I suspect the following patch might fix the problem; OK to commit? Yes, I had a look, and it should work. > If it does fix the problem, I'll submit a PR concerning the need for > someone to go through all gcc-bugs messages from the start of June until > now that contain a PR number in the Subject line but were not initial PR > submissions or sent to gcc-gnats, and send their URLs to the relevant PRs, > and reopen any wrongly closed for lack of feedback. Please do so. On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Jason Molenda wrote: > There is a new gnatsweb maintainer these days, and I'd wager he > may be ameanable to accepting this change. And if it does indeed fix the problem, Joseph, would you mind submitting this patch to gnats-devel@sources.redhat.com as well? It is only relevant for the gnatsweb 2.9x-branch, as gnatsweb 4.0 has changed quite a bit in this respect AFAICS. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/