From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3854 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2001 20:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3840 invoked by uid 71); 13 Nov 2001 20:46:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 07:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011113204602.3839.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: java/4776 Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/4776; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: Craig Rodrigues Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, george.goffe@seagate.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/4776 Date: 13 Nov 2001 14:03:52 -0700 >>>>> "Craig" == Craig Rodrigues writes: Craig> PR 4776 looks a lot like PR 2812. You submitted a patch Craig> which looks like it should have solved it, but according to this Craig> PR, it is still a problem in gcc 3.0.2. Craig> Any ideas? I can't explain it. The patch is definitely there, and I believe it was tested by a net user before it was committed. Maybe a look at config.log would help. It sounds like the gcc build is picking up the libiconv header file but for some reason it isn't seeing the libiconv library. Tom