From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18402 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2001 23:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18361 invoked by uid 71); 14 Nov 2001 23:16:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 11:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011114231602.18360.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jeff Sturm Subject: Re: java/4804 Reply-To: Jeff Sturm X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/4804; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeff Sturm To: Tom Tromey Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, georg.wild@gmx.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/4804 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:21:20 -0500 (EST) On 14 Nov 2001, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm writes: > > Jeff> I saw this too. In my case I have autoconf 2.50 installed. > Jeff> jar/Makefile has > > Jeff> EXEEXT = no > > An interesting failure! > > Did you re-run autoconf? If so then that is the problem. Use the > `contrib/gcc_update' script to do updates and you'll be ok. I think that's just what happened. Anyway, the configure script generated by autoconf 2.50 is broken... the first time through it writes ac_cv_exeext=no to the cache file. The next time, it takes the value "no" verbatim from cache. I'll report it to the autoconf folks. Shall we close this PR? Jeff