From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4762 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2001 04:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4681 invoked by uid 71); 16 Nov 2001 04:16:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 02:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011116041601.4680.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Youngjean Jung Subject: Re: fortran/4885: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of gcc/g77-3.0.x Reply-To: Youngjean Jung X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR fortran/4885; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Youngjean Jung To: Tim Prince Cc: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Youngjean Jung Subject: Re: fortran/4885: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of gcc/g77-3.0.x Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:06:02 -0800 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070700080307020905040900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Mr. Tim Prince : I checked the data file which my test2.f made. Endfile command resolved the I/O error, but unfortunatly data file is still wrong. Unnessary data is written in the wrong place. Let me send you with my test2.f. Try this. When I compiled test2.f by g77-2.96, no problem at all. But when I compiled it by g77-3.0.2, it still gives me a wrong data file. Youngjean. Tim Prince wrote: >Doesn't this require ENDFILE 51 before BACKSPACE 51 ? Sure, there have been >times when some implementation didn't care. >----- Original Message ----- >From: >To: >Cc: "Youngjean Jung" >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:10 PM >Subject: fortran/4885: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of >gcc/g77-3.0.x > > >>>Number: 4885 >>>Category: fortran >>>Synopsis: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of gcc/g77-3.0.x >>>Confidential: no >>>Severity: serious >>>Priority: medium >>>Responsible: unassigned >>>State: open >>>Class: sw-bug >>>Submitter-Id: net >>>Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 15 13:16:01 PST 2001 >>>Closed-Date: >>>Last-Modified: >>>Originator: Youngjean Jung >>>Release: 3.0 and higher >>>Organization: >>>Environment: >>> >>Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 >> >>>Description: >>> >> The following code: >> >> open(51,file='s1.dat',status='unknown',access='sequential') >> do k=1,100 >> call plot(k) >> end do >> close(51) >> end >> subroutine plot(k) >> j=0 >> do i=1,10 >> if(j.lt.5) then >> j=j+1 >> else >> backspace 51 >> endif >> write(51,*) j, k >> end do >> end >> >>gives: >> >>$ ./a.out >>$ ./a.out >>backspace: end of file >>apparent state: unit 51 named s1.dat >>last format: list io >>lately writing direct formatted external IO >>Aborted >> >>[Note: for the failure to appear, the code has to be run >> a second time] >> >>>How-To-Repeat: >>> >>>Fix: >>> >>>Release-Note: >>>Audit-Trail: >>>Unformatted: >>> > > --------------070700080307020905040900 Content-Type: text/plain; name="test2.f" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="test2.f" program test c implicit none integer i,k c do i=1,10 open(1,file='s1.dat',status='unknown',access='sequential') do k=1,10 write(1,*) k endfile 1 backspace 1 end do close(1) end do c end c c --------------070700080307020905040900--