From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11417-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10762 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2001 06:46:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10729 invoked by uid 71); 17 Nov 2001 06:46:02 -0000
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 03:29:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011117064602.10727.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Tanmoy Bhattacharya <tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: optimization/3906: Internal compiler error in change_address, at emit-rtl.c:1635
Reply-To: Tanmoy Bhattacharya <tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/3906; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tanmoy Bhattacharya <tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/3906: Internal compiler error in change_address, at emit-rtl.c:1635
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:43:57 -0600 (MDT)

 In <20010813222421.24786.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
  dated 22:24:21 -0000  August 13, 2001,
  rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org writes
  > Synopsis: Internal compiler error in change_address, at emit-rtl.c:1635
  >     Your example does not even compile.
  >     With, gcc version 3.0.1 20010813 (prerelease),
  >     I get many compilation errors, like:
  >     
  >     example.c:13: `p' was not declared in this scope
  >     example.c:14: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `setlim' with no type
 
 etc.
 
 I did not claim my example was valid C++.  And the command line I
 supplied was for invoking a C compiler, not a C++ one.
 
 Apart from the missing `line' directive after the # in the first line,
 it is a valid ISO standard C translaion unit, both according to C89
 and C9x (which got approved last year, I do not know what it is called
 now).
 
 I could probably provide a C++ example, but I do not have the time to
 test right now.  But a C compiler *must* compile every strictly
 conforming C program, which this one becomes if one supplies
 definitions for main and setloglim, possibly in a separate translation
 unit. 
 
 Tanmoy