From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23406 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2001 14:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23392 invoked by uid 71); 17 Nov 2001 14:06:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 19:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011117140600.23391.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Toon Moene Subject: Re: fortran/4885: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of gcc/g77-3.0.x Reply-To: Toon Moene X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR fortran/4885; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Toon Moene To: Youngjean Jung Cc: Tim Prince , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: fortran/4885: BACKSPACE example that doesn't work as of gcc/g77-3.0.x Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:07:58 +0100 Youngjean Jung wrote: > Don't you have any gabage letters in s2.dat? Ah, I finally see what you mean - it just didn't show up because I only did a cat of the s2.dat file. This is what od tells me: toon@laptop:~/g77-bugs$ od -c s2.dat 0000000 1 0 1 0 \n \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 0000020 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 * 0001040 \0 \0 1 0 1 1 \n 1 0 1 2 \n 0001060 1 0 1 3 \n 1 0 1 4 \n 1 0001100 0 1 5 \n 1 0 1 6 \n 1 0 0001120 1 7 \n 1 0 1 8 \n 1 0 1 9 0001140 \n 1 0 2 0 \n 0001150 This obviously is not correct. I'll look into this problem later this weekend. -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)