From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2564 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2001 20:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2542 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2001 20:26:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 13:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011118202601.2541.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Daniel Rohe Subject: Re: bootstrap/3542: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 Reply-To: Daniel Rohe X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3542; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Rohe To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: daniel.rohe@post.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/3542: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:09:35 +0100 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 28 19:15:25 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Can you tell us if this still occur with gcc 3.0.2? > We've had successful reports of gcc 3.0.x building > on Suse Linux. no problem, the history behind this 'bug' was rather simple and was in the end not related to the gcc source code. I thought this was documented in the mailing-list, but apparently I didn't update this subject - sorry. daniel > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3542&database=gcc > > -- Daniel Rohe Institut fuer Theoretische Physik Lehrstuhl C RWTH Aachen 52056 Aachen Tel.: 0241 8028392