From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2590 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2001 20:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2561 invoked by uid 71); 18 Nov 2001 20:26:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011118202601.2558.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: bootstrap/3542: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 Reply-To: Craig Rodrigues X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3542; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Craig Rodrigues To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/3542: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:25:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:09:35 +0100 From: Daniel Rohe Subject: Re: bootstrap/3542: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: daniel.rohe@post.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Reply-to: rohe@physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE X-Accept-Language: en-us User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: building gcc-3.0 fails on SuSE-7.1 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 28 19:15:25 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Can you tell us if this still occur with gcc 3.0.2? > We've had successful reports of gcc 3.0.x building > on Suse Linux. no problem, the history behind this 'bug' was rather simple and was in the end not related to the gcc source code. I thought this was documented in the mailing-list, but apparently I didn't update this subject - sorry. daniel > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3542&database=gcc > > -- Daniel Rohe Institut fuer Theoretische Physik Lehrstuhl C RWTH Aachen 52056 Aachen Tel.: 0241 8028392