From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11528-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31129 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 03:57:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31053 invoked by uid 61); 19 Nov 2001 03:57:26 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 05:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011119035726.31052.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gp@iws.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.2
Subject: Re: optimization/3446: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 19:57:26 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    I can reproduce your problem with
    gcc version 3.0.3 20011118 (prerelease).
    
    However, in gcc version 3.1 20011110 (experimental),
    the printf statements are always the same, no matter what
    optimization level is chosen.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3446&database=gcc