From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11530-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2268 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 04:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2240 invoked by uid 71); 19 Nov 2001 04:06:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 07:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011119040601.2239.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/3446: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0
Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/3446; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gp@iws.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/3446: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0
Date: 19 Nov 2001 03:57:26 -0000

 Synopsis: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 19:57:26 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     I can reproduce your problem with
     gcc version 3.0.3 20011118 (prerelease).
     
     However, in gcc version 3.1 20011110 (experimental),
     the printf statements are always the same, no matter what
     optimization level is chosen.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3446&database=gcc