From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11539-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28071 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 11:36:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28043 invoked by uid 71); 19 Nov 2001 11:36:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011119113601.28039.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: other/1494: Residual EGCS references in comments
Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/1494; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: other/1494: Residual EGCS references in comments
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:27:59 +0000 (GMT)

 On 19 Nov 2001 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: Residual EGCS references in comments
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 19:32:01 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     This looks OK to me, do you want to go ahead an commit this?
 
 The EGCS references in the present tense are still there, still waiting
 for the target maintainers to bring them up to date to describe current
 GCC instead.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk