From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11542-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30118 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 11:46:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30077 invoked by uid 71); 19 Nov 2001 11:46:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011119114606.30074.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4548
Reply-To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4548; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ahu@hubert.ds9a.nl
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4548
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:40:16 +0100

 Since a self-contained testcase did not show up, I went ahead and
 reconstructed one myself submitter's hints, which indeed demostrates a
 serious (albeit rare) problem of the current basic_string::reserve.
 
 Patch posted as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00150.html
 
 Cheers,
 Paolo Carlini.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4548&database=gcc