From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11553-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13969 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 20:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13939 invoked by uid 71); 19 Nov 2001 20:16:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011119201601.13938.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: optimization/4889
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/4889; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        pgregory@aqsis.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/4889
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:25:35 +0100

 Hi,
 
 I tried to reduce the size of the provided testcase a little bit
 and distilled the following 3 lines of code that still crash 3.0.2
 (just compile with g++ -O):
 
 double& f();
 struct A { A (int i) { i?f():f(); } };
 A a(1);
 
 In fact they also crash 3.1 (as of 20011112)! So, being able to compile
 the original testcase with 3.1 without errors just seems to be good/bad
 luck.
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4889&database=gcc