From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3134 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2001 04:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3092 invoked by uid 71); 20 Nov 2001 04:36:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011120043602.3091.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/4596: GCC 3.0.1 optimization causes segmentation violation in executable Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/4596; it has been noted by GNATS. From: rth@gcc.gnu.org To: Matt.Rhodes@synergex.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/4596: GCC 3.0.1 optimization causes segmentation violation in executable Date: 20 Nov 2001 04:32:34 -0000 Synopsis: GCC 3.0.1 optimization causes segmentation violation in executable Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Nov 19 20:32:33 2001 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 19 20:32:33 2001 State-Changed-Why: In the future, provide _all_ of the information requested in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html as you've not provided enough information. That said, the existance of -fomit-frame-pointer in your command line suggests that perhaps http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg00698.html might solve your problem. If not, submit a proper report. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4596&database=gcc