From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7393 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2001 20:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7366 invoked by uid 71); 21 Nov 2001 20:36:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011121203601.7364.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: preprocessor/4902: no macro redef warnings Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/4902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Zack Weinberg Cc: "Golubev I. N." , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/4902: no macro redef warnings Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:06:34 +0000 Zack Weinberg wrote:- > This warning was on by default in 2.95, and I agree with the reporter > that non-trivial redefinitions do tend to represent bugs. > warn_of_redefinition is your code, so I must presume you meant to > change it - why? I don't remember; I don't think I did change it. I suspect the semantics were already there. In fact, I seem to remember us discussing this last year, and you having some reason for wanting it -pedantic. Or was that something else? Anyway, we seem to be agreed. I'll make it unconditional. Neil.