From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11685-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3671 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2001 21:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3606 invoked by uid 71); 21 Nov 2001 21:16:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011121211602.3604.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: pme@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/2913
Reply-To: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/2913; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: Brad Garcia <garsh@home.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/2913
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:35:12 -0500

 On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:56:00PM -0000, Brad Garcia wrote:
 >  Basically, we will never catch errors that occur when we attempt
 >  to close a stream (where the close causes a final flush to occur
 >  before actually closing the file).
 
 I have posted a patch that causes the return from fclose() to be checked.
 Still waiting on approval.
 
 pme