From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-11709-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10532 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 04:54:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10472 invoked by uid 61); 22 Nov 2001 04:54:47 -0000
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 16:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011122045447.10467.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: eljay@adobe.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.2
Subject: Re: optimization/2072: SPARC leaf function loses %l7 contents spuriously
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: SPARC leaf function loses %l7 contents spuriously

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 21 20:54:46 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    From PR 2109:
    
    Using -ffloat-store -fPIC -O3 will avoid the bug.
    Good, now I won't need any more followups!
    I'm contacting John West at Sun to inform him of these
    findings.  Keep the ball rolling.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=2072&database=gcc