From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11338 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 04:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11291 invoked by uid 71); 22 Nov 2001 04:56:04 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 22:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011122045604.11289.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/2072: SPARC leaf function loses %l7 contents spuriously Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/2072; it has been noted by GNATS. From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org To: eljay@adobe.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/2072: SPARC leaf function loses %l7 contents spuriously Date: 22 Nov 2001 04:54:47 -0000 Synopsis: SPARC leaf function loses %l7 contents spuriously State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 21 20:54:46 2001 State-Changed-Why: From PR 2109: Using -ffloat-store -fPIC -O3 will avoid the bug. Good, now I won't need any more followups! I'm contacting John West at Sun to inform him of these findings. Keep the ball rolling. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=2072&database=gcc