From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17211 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2001 11:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17154 invoked by uid 61); 24 Nov 2001 11:00:40 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 00:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011124110040.17153.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> To: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, zack@gcc.gnu.org From: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.2 Subject: Re: c/4939: [cygwin] Failure of test gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00576.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [cygwin] Failure of test gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->zack Responsible-Changed-By: jsm28 Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 24 03:00:39 2001 Responsible-Changed-Why: The testcase failures are expected until Zack's patch is in. The deficiencies in Cygwin's - if GCC needs to use that rather than its own functional - are for the Cygwin maintainers to deal with, though fixincludes perhaps ought to fix the problems on existing versions of Cygwin with deficient headers. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: jsm28 State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 24 03:00:39 2001 State-Changed-Why: The testcase fails (depending on architecture). This is expected. Zack asked me to write the testcases; having done so I added them. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-08/msg01411.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg01370.html http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4939&database=gcc