From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-12174-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18017 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2001 02:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17998 invoked by uid 71); 2 Dec 2001 02:56:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 18:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011202025600.17997.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
        kenny.simpson@gs.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)

 > Cool.  Is the bool overload for get and do_get a gcc-ism?
 
 No, there has to be a bool overload in case boolalpha == true, capice? I 
 believe the current code is standards-conforming, especially WRT the 
 num_get DR's. 
 
 See: 
 
 22.2.2.1 - Template class num_get [lib.locale.num.get]
 
 -benjamin