From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9126 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 11:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9112 invoked by uid 71); 10 Dec 2001 11:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 03:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011210113601.9111.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/5059: Compiling s/w containing the use of DIR.H fails on other stat-calls Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00564.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/5059; it has been noted by GNATS. From: neil@gcc.gnu.org To: Jules.vanWeerden@vet.uu.nl, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/5059: Compiling s/w containing the use of DIR.H fails on other stat-calls Date: 10 Dec 2001 11:33:32 -0000 Synopsis: Compiling s/w containing the use of DIR.H fails on other stat-calls State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 10 03:33:31 2001 State-Changed-Why: Please submit a proper bug report that contains the source code that fails and the macro definition. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html But I suspect that before you do that you'll see that what the preprocessor is claiming is correct. Use -E -dM to get a dump of the macros used. I bet you're pulling in a different header than your other compiler. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=5059&database=gcc