Re: c++/4624: Bogus warning (private in aggregate types)

[Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/4624; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de,
        gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/4624: Bogus warning (private in aggregate types)
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 20:44:40 +0100 (CET)

 On 15 Dec 2001 nathan@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: Bogus warning (private in aggregate types)
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: nathan
 > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 15 11:24:25 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     I don't think it's bogus. all the user defined members
 >     are private. The class is still POD.
 >     
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4624
 > 
 
 Mr John Maddock Implementor of the boost config test suite has a different
 point of view. 
 He says: "The compiler misreads 8.5.1, treating classes as non-aggregate
 if they contain private or protected member functions.",
 cf. boost/libs/config/test/boost_no_priv_aggregate.cxx.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Peter Schmid