From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13002-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3957 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2001 12:26:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3933 invoked by uid 71); 16 Dec 2001 12:26:03 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 04:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011216122603.3932.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Martin von Loewis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: c++/4283: Implicit typename extension should be optional
Reply-To: Martin von Loewis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00910.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/4283; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Martin von Loewis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/4283: Implicit typename extension should be optional
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:23:25 +0100 (MET)

 >     Is this sufficient? You get an unconditional warning
 >     on its use now.
 
 That sounds good - assuming it was a proper extension (i.e. whenever
 the compiler was inserting typename, compilation would fail with
 -pedantic).
 
 Regards,
 Martin