public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: preprocessor/5153: #include path not affected by #line in cpplib
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011219001601.17944.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/5153; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: John Marshall <jmarshall@acm.org>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/5153: #include path not affected by #line in cpplib
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:14:35 -0800

 On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:07:28PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
 > > 
 > > (In the real world, what we have is foo.y, foo.h in a source directory,
 > > and foo.c has been generated in a separate build directory from foo.y.
 > > Because most GNU projects put foo.c in the source directory, they haven't
 > > encountered the problem described, but that doesn't mean arranging builds
 > > like this is invalid.)
 > 
 > Zack, is this limitation intentional or arbitrary?  It seems having it
 > affect the path can be useful, but I worry about side-effects on
 > existing code.  Then again, John says this was the historical behaviour.
 
 It was intentionally changed, but I do not remember why.  If no one
 can point to code which is broken by the historical behaviour, it
 probably makes sense to change it back.
 
 Note that a simple -I../src will cause foo.h to be found again.
 
 zw


             reply	other threads:[~2001-12-19  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-18 16:16 Zack Weinberg [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-24 12:22 John Marshall
2002-02-23  9:56 neil
2001-12-18 15:16 Neil Booth
2001-12-18  6:46 John Marshall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011219001601.17944.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=zack@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).