From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13091-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23264 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2001 03:26:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23247 invoked by uid 71); 20 Dec 2001 03:26:05 -0000
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011220032605.23245.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...'
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00999.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/4122; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Robert Boehne <rboehne@ricardo-us.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, juergen@monocerus.demon.co.uk,
   boehme@informatik.hu-berlin.de, loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, michael@ritzert.de,
   gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...'
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 03:09:19 +0000

 No, it should never be necessary to generate thunks with the vtable; if
 there's a thunk missing, either it should be generated with the function or
 it should not be needed.
 
 Jason