From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25228 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2001 16:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25185 invoked by uid 71); 20 Dec 2001 16:46:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 08:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011220164603.25181.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco Subject: Re: java/3417: Downcast on integral types. Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg01009.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/3417; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org, fmedio@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: java/3417: Downcast on integral types. Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 08:42:15 -0800 (PST) tromey@gcc.gnu.org writes: > I submitted a patch, which is pending review: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg02037.html OK, so the code handling boolean was removed because your patch generalizes the promotion of the type of returned values, right? The patch seems to be fine, although I don't have the time to run tests myself. You can check it in. Thank you for handling this. ./A