From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13102-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21085 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2001 17:46:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21042 invoked by uid 71); 20 Dec 2001 17:46:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011220174602.21039.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: java/3417: Downcast on integral types.
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg01010.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/3417; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: apbianco@cygnus.com
Cc: fmedio@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/3417: Downcast on integral types.
Date: 20 Dec 2001 10:50:36 -0700

 Alex> OK, so the code handling boolean was removed because your patch
 Alex> generalizes the promotion of the type of returned values, right?
 
 Exactly.
 
 Alex> The patch seems to be fine, although I don't have the time to
 Alex> run tests myself. You can check it in. Thank you for handling
 Alex> this.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Tom