From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16622 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2001 12:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16608 invoked by uid 71); 21 Dec 2001 12:56:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011221125605.16607.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...' Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg01033.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/4122; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell To: Jason Merrill Cc: Robert Boehne , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, juergen@monocerus.demon.co.uk, boehme@informatik.hu-berlin.de, loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, michael@ritzert.de, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...' Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:51:55 +0000 Jason Merrill wrote: > > No, it should never be necessary to generate thunks with the vtable; if > there's a thunk missing, either it should be generated with the function or > it should not be needed. Shall I look at this, or are you? nathan -- Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?' nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org