From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9298 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2001 23:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9254 invoked by uid 61); 28 Dec 2001 23:51:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011228235111.9253.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pme@gcc.gnu.org, stevemw@place.org From: pme@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: pme@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pme@gcc.gnu.org, stevemw@place.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: libstdc++/1853: deallocates unowned memory within .pop_back() X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg01202.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: deallocates unowned memory within .pop_back() Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->pme Responsible-Changed-By: pme Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 28 15:51:10 2001 Responsible-Changed-Why: I changed it. Still an issue as of today. The internals of deque aren't documented very well at all. I want to figure out what memory games are being played before changing the code; the obvious solution may be too slow. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1853