From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29174 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2002 19:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29124 invoked by uid 71); 1 Jan 2002 19:36:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 11:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020101193601.29123.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 Reply-To: Craig Rodrigues X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Craig Rodrigues To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:35:43 -0500 Delivered-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:06:23 +0100 From: Wolfgang Messingschlager X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > > Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 1 21:52:29 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > If you want to build a static version of gcc, then > use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure. > See: > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html > > Can you tell me if that works for you? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc Sorry for the delay, I was in holidays. I have tested to use the --disable-shared flag during configure. This has solved my problem. You can close this "bug" Wolfgang