From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13469-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22566 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2002 15:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22532 invoked by uid 71); 3 Jan 2002 15:06:00 -0000
Resent-Date: 3 Jan 2002 15:06:00 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20020103150600.22531.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, luke@stat.umn.edu
Received:(qmail 21230 invoked by uid 61); 3 Jan 2002 15:02:52 -0000
Message-Id:<20020103150252.21229.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 07:06:00 -0000
From: luke@stat.umn.edu
Reply-To: luke@stat.umn.edu
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version:gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: optimization/5264: Possible optimization bug at -O2 on HP-UX
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         5264
>Category:       optimization
>Synopsis:       Possible optimization bug at -O2 on HP-UX
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Jan 03 07:06:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Luke Tierney
>Release:        gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
HP-UX bass B.11.00 A 9000/780 2007851940
>Description:
A possible optimization bug at -O2 on HP-UX found in building
R (Gnu S).  Simplified program:
 ---------------(opttest.c)--------------------------------------------#include <stdio.h>

double x[] = { 1.0, 2.0}, y[] = { 1.0, 2.0 }, z[2];

main()
{
  int i, i1, i2, n, n1, n2;

  i1 = i2 = 0;
  n = n1 = n2 = 2;

  for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    z[i] = x[i1] + y[i2];
    i1 = (++i1 == n1) ? 0 : i1;
    i2 = (++i2 == n2) ? 0 : i2;
  }
  printf("z[1] = %g\n", z[1]);
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Without optimization or with just -O it works fine:

tierney@bass [125]% gcc -o opttest opttest.c
ltierney@bass [126]% ./opttest 
z[1] = 4ltierney@bass [127]% gcc -O -o opttest opttest.c
ltierney@bass [128]% ./opttest
z[1] = 4

But with -O2 it gets the wrong answer:

ltierney@bass [129]% gcc -O2 -o opttest opttest.c
ltierney@bass [130]% ./opttest
z[1] = 2

Please let me know if you need additional info.


>How-To-Repeat:
On HP-UX compare output of

gcc -O2 -o opttest opttest.c; ./opttest
gcc -O -o opttest opttest.c; ./opttest
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="opttest.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="opttest.c"

I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN0ZGlvLmg+Cgpkb3VibGUgeFtdID0geyAxLjAsIDIuMH0sIHlbXSA9IHsgMS4w
LCAyLjAgfSwgelsyXTsKCm1haW4oKQp7CiAgaW50IGksIGkxLCBpMiwgbiwgbjEsIG4yOwoKICBp
MSA9IGkyID0gMDsKICBuID0gbjEgPSBuMiA9IDI7CgogIGZvciAoaSA9IDA7IGkgPCBuOyBpKysp
IHsKICAgIHpbaV0gPSB4W2kxXSArIHlbaTJdOwogICAgaTEgPSAoKytpMSA9PSBuMSkgPyAwIDog
aTE7CiAgICBpMiA9ICgrK2kyID09IG4yKSA/IDAgOiBpMjsKICB9CiAgcHJpbnRmKCJ6WzFdID0g
JWdcbiIsIHpbMV0pOwp9Cg==