public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
@ 2002-01-04 20:18 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2002-01-04 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, swansma

Synopsis: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Fri Jan  4 20:18:10 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Not the correct way to add information to a PR.
    Go to:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&database=gcc&pr=5282
    
    and click on "send e-mail to interested parties"

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5283


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
@ 2002-01-04 20:36 Mark Swanson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Swanson @ 2002-01-04 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR pending/5283; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, swansma@yahoo.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:21:38 -0500

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On January 4, 2002 11:18 pm, you wrote:
 > Synopsis: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan  4 20:18:10 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Not the correct way to add information to a PR.
 >     Go to:
 >     http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&database=gcc&pr=5282
 >
 >     and click on "send e-mail to interested parties"
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&
 >pr=5283
 
 Thanks for the response. But, what makes you think I didn't do that? The SMTP 
 To: header should prove I did exactly that.
 
 ?
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
 
 iD8DBQE8Nn9XP6+Az0OIt2IRAoKsAJ4s70oNPoyZYpdIyOfWzVDtPVEVzACfQKJm
 hF0VseT0JzUpkP1W9OsmrmU=
 =m0HC
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-05  4:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-04 20:18 pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238 rodrigc
2002-01-04 20:36 Mark Swanson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).