From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11671 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2002 04:36:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11640 invoked by uid 71); 5 Jan 2002 04:36:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 20:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020105043602.11639.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Swanson Subject: Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238 Reply-To: Mark Swanson X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR pending/5283; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Swanson To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, swansma@yahoo.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:21:38 -0500 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On January 4, 2002 11:18 pm, you wrote: > Synopsis: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 4 20:18:10 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Not the correct way to add information to a PR. > Go to: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&database=gcc&pr=5282 > > and click on "send e-mail to interested parties" > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc& >pr=5283 Thanks for the response. But, what makes you think I didn't do that? The SMTP To: header should prove I did exactly that. ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8Nn9XP6+Az0OIt2IRAoKsAJ4s70oNPoyZYpdIyOfWzVDtPVEVzACfQKJm hF0VseT0JzUpkP1W9OsmrmU= =m0HC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----