From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13557-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11679 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2002 04:36:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11655 invoked by uid 71); 5 Jan 2002 04:36:03 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 20:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020105043603.11653.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: pending/5283: BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
Reply-To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR pending/5283; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>
Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: pending/5283: BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:32:22 -0500

 On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:21:38PM -0500, Mark Swanson wrote:
 > Thanks for the response. But, what makes you think I didn't do that? The SMTP 
 > To: header should prove I did exactly that.
 > 
 > ?
 
 Did you change the Subject: header?  That messes up GNATS,
 and your addendum created a messed up bug report.
 Never change the Subject: header when replying to things
 in GNATS.  GNATS is not too resilient unfortunately. :(