Re: c++/5282: .so exception handler works in 3.0.2 not 3.0.3

[Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/5282; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/5282: .so exception handler works in 3.0.2 not 3.0.3
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:19:19 -0500

 On January 4, 2002 11:53 pm, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: .so exception handler works in 3.0.2 not 3.0.3
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan  4 20:53:38 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     You did not provide enough files to compile your testcase:
 >     tuxmodule.h:31:17: tux.h: No such file or directory
 >
 >     Instead of feeding us files one by one, read the
 >     bug submission instructions at:
 >     http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html and give us a single preprocessed
 >     source file.
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&
 >pr=5282
 
 The update I sent (BugLib.cpp) does not require tuxmodule.h at all. My hope 
 was that would be enough to meet the requirements. It's three tiny files 
 instead of one, but they don't require any third party package...
 
 Because of the nature of the test case requiring the creation of a shared 
 library, and a test program to load it, that would require two preprocessed 
 files. Would that be preferrable than my three tiny source files?
 
 Lemme know.
 Thanks.