From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13780-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20332 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 13:56:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20304 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jan 2002 13:56:06 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 05:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020111135606.20302.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Subject: Re: target/5353: GCC/arm runs forever with -O on this file (mhz.c 
 from lmbench)
Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/5353; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Cc: nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Subject: Re: target/5353: GCC/arm runs forever with -O on this file (mhz.c 
 from lmbench)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:47:03 +0000

 >  
 >  Yes, this is something of an old favourite.  I'm surprised it isn't in GNATS
 >  already.  See, for example:
 
 It is, it's PR optimization/2391.  AFAICT, nobody has looked at it :-(
 
 R.