From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13782-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21847 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 18:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21833 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jan 2002 18:26:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020111182602.21832.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: java/5361: gcj bug 
Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/5361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: Andreas Lenz <andreas.lenz@handy-games.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/5361: gcj bug 
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:22:09 -0800 (PST)

 Andreas Lenz writes:
 
 > 	changing (2) to ++dst_byte;dst[dst_byte] != (tmp & 0xff); works !
 
 Most likely a compiler bug. Are you compiling natively or to bytecode
 only?
 
 ./A