From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9707 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 18:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9676 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jan 2002 18:56:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020111185601.9669.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: java/5361: gcj bug Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/5361; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: Andreas Lenz Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/5361: gcj bug Date: 11 Jan 2002 12:05:15 -0700 >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Lenz writes: >> Release: 3.0.3 I believe this is already fixed on the cvs trunk. I think the fix is this patch: 2001-11-18 Tom Tromey Fix for PR java/1401: * jcf-write.c (generate_bytecode_insns) [binop]: Handle case where arg0 is null. (generate_bytecode_insns) [MODIFY_EXPR]: Handle `OP=' case correctly. Andreas> java code: Andreas> public void function(byte[] dst,...) Andreas> { Andreas> [ ... ] Could you send a small but working sample program that shows the bug? That would let me verify that it is indeed fixed. Tom