From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16372 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2002 20:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16355 invoked by uid 71); 12 Jan 2002 20:56:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020112205601.16352.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: libgcj/5364: .class files not being interpreted correctly Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00467.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libgcj/5364; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: mkuruvil@yahoo.co.in Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libgcj/5364: .class files not being interpreted correctly Date: 12 Jan 2002 14:06:59 -0700 >>>>> "Mathew" == mkuruvil writes: Mathew> However, both executions were the same when if the gnu.rex Mathew> java files were compiled with the corresponding compiler. gcj Mathew> only has trouble reading the .class files generated by some Mathew> other compiler. I looked at this a little bit. `gij' gets the same results as `java', but a `gcj'-compiled executable gets different results. So it looks like a compiler bug (and not a library problem or something like that). Tom