From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6616 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 21:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6592 invoked by uid 61); 17 Jan 2002 21:54:27 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020117215427.6591.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: fago@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, fago@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: preprocessor/5416: Need flag for cpp to allow fortran comments X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Need flag for cpp to allow fortran comments State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 17 13:54:26 2002 State-Changed-Why: I really have no interest in implementing this; we don't want to encourage people to abuse cpp. I expect that most of your problems would be solved by -traditional with judicious use of a tool like sed. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5416