From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-13991-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9577 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2002 05:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9563 invoked by uid 71); 18 Jan 2002 05:36:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020118053600.9562.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: other/5414: Suggest using -z1 option for cvs in contrib/gcc_update
Reply-To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00642.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/5414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, georg.wild@gmx.de,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: other/5414: Suggest using -z1 option for cvs in contrib/gcc_update
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:27:08 -0500

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5414
 
 The instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org recommend using -z 9, so would
 this
 be acceptable to add to gcc_update?
 
 Index: gcc_update
 ===================================================================
 RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/contrib/gcc_update,v
 retrieving revision 1.33
 diff -u -r1.33 gcc_update
 --- gcc_update  2001/11/07 20:26:58     1.33
 +++ gcc_update  2002/01/18 05:26:40
 @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
  fi
 
  echo "Updating CVS tree"
 -cvs -q update ${1+"$@"}
 +cvs -z 9 -q update ${1+"$@"}
  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
      (touch_files_reexec)
      echo "CVS update of full tree failed." >&2
 
 --
 Craig Rodrigues
 http://www.gis.net/~craigr
 rodrigc@mediaone.net