From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11772 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2002 07:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11752 invoked by uid 71); 18 Jan 2002 07:36:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020118073600.11751.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: preprocessor/5416: Need flag for cpp to allow fortran comments Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/5416; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Matt Fago Cc: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/5416: Need flag for cpp to allow fortran comments Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:28:49 +0000 Matt Fago wrote:- > Using cpp with g77 is abusing cpp? I hope not! Of course it is, Fortran is not C, or a C-family language. > I can certainly use sed, but I had hoped it would not be necessary > in the future. BTW, suggesting that people use c-style comments in > Fortran code seems silly, and would be difficult in my case even > with sed. I didn't suggest using C-style comments. Neil.