From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-14013-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31207 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2002 17:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31181 invoked by uid 71); 18 Jan 2002 17:46:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020118174601.31178.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Phil Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Subject: Re: target/491
Reply-To: Phil Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/491; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/491
Date: 18 Jan 2002 17:43:22 +0000

 Some analysis of this bug is at
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/1999-10n/msg00097.html